Republican Leaders Oppose Radical Proposals "Bullying Bill" and "Comprehensive" Sex Education Require DefeatNC NEWS - North Carolina House and Senate Republicans oppose two bills that appear to perpetuate class hierarchy within the education system. The two Bills, SB 526 "School Violence Prevention Act" and HB 776, "No Bullying Anyone at Public Schools," both provide harassment protection to victims of specific class categories, namely, those victims who are harassed because of their "sexual orientation" and "gender identification." Instead, House and Senate Republicans contend the two bills should be amended as to protect all individuals no matter of race, color, religion, sex or national origin as culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. House Republican Leader Paul Stam (R-Wake) and Senate Republican Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) announced opposition to two controversial bills expected to be acted on this week. Amendments will be offered during consideration of these bills to remove provisions most onerous to young people. The "Bullying Bill", SB 526, titled "School Violence Prevention Act", is scheduled for a hearing in the House Education Committee this morning. Rather than providing protection to all students from all harassment, this bill specifies categories of victims. "Sexual orientation" and "gender identification" are two such categories which single out special classes of victims. Rep. Stam stated that he intends to offer language from HB 776, "No Bullying Anyone at Public Schools", as a substitute to SB 526. HB 776 has 62 bipartisan sponsors. This is consistent with State Board of Education policy, adopted in 2004. This has worked well and does not differentiate between types of bullying or potential victims. It is ironic that the House proponents of the enumerated category legislation claim that a prohibition covering all students would be ineffective. Just twelve days ago they all voted for the "cybernet bullying" bill sponsored by Rep. Nick Mackey (D-Mecklenburg). HB 1261 protects all "minors" without differentiation or enumeration.
The euphemistically named, "Healthy Youth Act", HB 88, is scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Committee on Mental Health and Youth Services later this week. This bill mandates that local school districts provide "comprehensive" sex education to all middle school students. This prescribed curriculum changes the current focus from abstinence from sexual activity until marriage to a much broader direction promoting risky and alternative sexual behaviors. "Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education", which is attached (NCBOE Policy), provides curriculum guidance for "comprehensive" sex education in a way most North Carolina parents reject. It is no more comprehensive than abstinence education, only more radical. Local school districts have the authority to offer sex education curricula other than abstinence before marriage, but only 10 of the state's 115 school districts do so. During House consideration of this bill, Republicans forced Democrats to make several changes to what was an otherwise bad bill during committee consideration and floor debate. As a result, students would no longer be forced to take the "comprehensive" sex education curriculum if a parental consent form is not returned. The original bill required most students to take the "comprehensive" curriculum. House Republicans also succeeded in having the bill's sponsors remove language requiring middle school students to be taught respect for "long term committed relationships" as an equivalent to marriage. Using the term "comprehensive" as the title for the prescribed curriculum will suggest to teachers that they encourage middle school students to experiment with various forms of risky behavior. That is the approach of the National Guidelines on Comprehensive Sexuality Education.
Finally, in a nationally televised address on June 6, 1963, President John F. Kennedy urged the nation to take action toward guaranteeing equal treatment of every American regardless of race. Notwithstanding Kennedy's assassination, his proposal developed into the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson outlawing segregation in businesses, associations, and public places such as libraries and public schools. Apparently, some of our North Carolina General Assembly no longer believe in equality, and forget that class hierarchy leads to segregation, a synonym for discrimination. |
|